ВУЗ: Не указан

Категория: Не указан

Дисциплина: Не указана

Добавлен: 09.04.2024

Просмотров: 178

Скачиваний: 0

ВНИМАНИЕ! Если данный файл нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам.

GI gas pattern. Air is commonly present in the stomach and colon. However, air in the small intestine

is abnormal and suggests an intra -abdominal process.

Paralytic ileus (see II B )

Air that is evenly distributed throughout the small and large intestine usually signifies paralysis of the bowel secondary to a process that is not primarily surgical.

Ileus may be localized to a specific area, such as the “sentinel” loop , an area of localized duodenal ileus adjacent to the pancreas in acute pancreatitis.

Acute gastric dilation is indicated by a markedly dilated gastric bubble. (This condition can result in severe abdominal pain and vasovagal hypotension but is easily treated by nasogastric tube decompression.)

Mechanical obstruction of the intestine (see II A ) is revealed by the presence of distended airand fluid -filled loops of bowel proximal to the obstruction and decompressed intestine distally. This air may be absent in the distal tract, particularly the rectum, unless air has been introduced by an enema given in the past 24 hours.

Mechanical bowel obstruction is an important diagnosis because it may be associated with strangulation of the bowel with resultant ischemia and necrosis. When both ends of a loop of bowel are obstructed, such as occurs with a volvulus, this is termed a closed loop obstruction and represents a surgical emergency due to the high risk of rupture and generalized peritonitis.

Postoperative adhesions, carcinoma of the colon, and inguinal hernias are the three most common causes of bowel obstruction. Specific causes may be diagnosed by the intestinal gas pattern.

Hernias may result in intestinal air located in a nonanatomic location. For example, an inguinal hernia may show gas -filled intestine extended below the inguinal ligament.

Volvulus is a segment of bowel that has twisted upon itself, resulting in both mechanical obstruction and vascular compromise. It may appear on the plain film as an isolated distended loop of bowel with tapered (“bird -beak”) margins. A sigmoid volvulus is treated by sigmoidoscopy and decompression. Other types of volvulus are treated operatively.

An ischemic or gangrenous bowel may produce few radiologic findings. If the colon is affected, however, the mucosal edema may be seen as “thumbprinting” on the wall of a dilated colon.

Isolated distention of the colon by large amounts of air may be seen on radiograph. It may be due to any of the acute processes, such as distal colonic obstruction, which may be secondary to malignancy, profound constipation, stricture, or volvulus; “toxic megacolon,” a massive colonic dilation that is associated with acute colitis; and colonic ileus , a condition of obscure etiology that results in marked distention of the cecum. If the cecum enlarges past 10–12 cm in diameter, there is a significant risk of perforation.

P.184

Abnormal air collections outside the intestinal lumen

Free air within the peritoneal cavity signals a perforation of a hollow viscus and indicates a surgical emergency.

It is present in about 80% of gastroduodenal perforations but in fewer than 25% of colonic perforations.

Free peritoneal air is rarely secondary to other causes. However, it may be present in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and for up to 1 week after a laparotomy.

Air collections within the wall of the colon, a condition termed pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis, generally indicate an isolated, walled -off intestinal perforation.

Air stippling within soft tissue structures may indicate the dissection of air into the tissues from a thoracic source, such as a pneumothorax. It may, however, be due to a rapidly progressive, catastrophic gas -forming infection (see Chapter 2, V ), which is a true surgical emergency.

Air-fluid level outside the intestinal tract is associated with a subphrenic or subhepatic abscess.

Air within the biliary tree indicates an abnormal communication between the biliary tree and the intestinal tract. Causes include:

A surgical connection created to provide biliary drainage (e.g., choledochoduodenostomy)

A gas -forming infection within the biliary tree (cholangitis). Cholangitis is associated with biliary obstruction and should be treated with antibiotics followed closely by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy to drain the biliary tract.

Large gallstones, particularly in the elderly, which can erode into the adjacent intestine (usually the duodenum), allowing air to enter the biliary tract and the gallstone to enter the bowel. Usually, this produces transient symptoms initially, until several days later when the gallstone impacts upon and obstructs the distal ileum, producing small bowel obstruction (gallstone ileus).

Air within the portal vein is seen when a gas -forming infection affects the portal system (pylephlebitis). The infection usually derives from necrotic tissue, particularly from the small intestine, appendix, or left colon.

Abnormal calcifications

Renal stones are calcified in up to 85% of cases and appear along the path of the ureter.

Fecaliths (calcified material within the appendix) are strong evidence for acute appendicitis in patients with abdominal pain.

Pancreatic calcification suggests chronic pancreatitis.

Gallstones are calcified in 15% of cases.


Heavily calcified vessels may be present in mesenteric ischemia.

Masses , such as teratomas or malignant neoplasms, may calcify.

Soft tissue shadows

Peritoneal fat lines and psoas muscle shadows may be lost in rapidly spreading infections, hematomas, or abscesses.

Margins of solid organs (liver, kidney, or spleen) may be displaced from their normal locations by an abnormal mass.

A distended bladder may be visible and may be responsible for marked abdominal pain.

Contrast roentgenography can be highly useful in patients with an acute abdominal process that remains undiagnosed after other studies.

Intravenous pyelogram (IVP) should be obtained if a renal stone is suspected. It is also useful in identifying acute pyelonephritis, perinephric abscess, or renal infarction. When a patient suspected of having appendicitis has microscopic hematuria, the IVP is particularly useful for verifying that the hematuria is due to the periappendiceal inflammation rather than to a renal stone.

Barium swallow is helpful if it is suspected that the patient's esophagus has ruptured during a violent episode of vomiting. Known as Boerhaave's syndrome , this unusual accident may result in a left pleural effusion, which communicates with the esophageal rent, as demonstrated by the barium swallow.

P.185

Upper GI series, using diatrizoate meglumine (Gastrografin), a water -soluble radiopaque dye, should be performed if a perforation of the stomach or duodenum is suspected but cannot be proven because free air is not visible on the plain film.

Placing contrast materials into the colon and rectum should be done very cautiously when an inflammatory condition or a perforation is suspected because even a small increase in pressure could easily convert friable tissue into a frank perforation.

This procedure is best used when the diagnosis of colon perforation is suspected and especially in a patient taking anti -inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs, particularly corticosteroids.

In such cases, diatrizoate meglumine should be used because barium sulfate, when it mixes with stool and detritus from an infection, becomes firmly attached to the peritoneal cavity. Extensive abscess formation results, even after the surgeon attempts to irrigate the area thoroughly.

Small bowel follow-through contrast study tracks the barium through the small intestine after an upper GI series. It is useful in identifying a point of small bowel obstruction when either the history, the physical examination, or plain radiography fails to verify the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction.

G

Abdominal ultrasonography is usually of little diagnostic value in the patient with abdominal distention and severe pain, but it can be helpful when acute cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, biliary obstruction, or an abscess is suspected. Computed tomography may also be helpful, but is generally reserved for the patient whose condition

remains undiagnosed after other studies have been exhausted. Some have advocated its use to assist in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

H

General principles used in the approach to the patient with acute abdominal pain are discussed below.

A careful and systematic evaluation of the patient should be routinely performed. Most patients will have a well-documented diagnosis if this principle is followed.

Statistically speaking, certain diagnoses are very common , such as appendicitis and gastroenteritis, whereas other diagnoses are quite rare, such as pylephlebitis. The physician should not search for an occult diagnosis when a common diagnosis is more likely to be correct.

When the diagnosis is not initially clear, continued observation and repeated blood studies (complete blood count, arterial blood gases, amylase, and electrolytes) may lead to the correct diagnosis as the disease process evolves.

Although this practice might be desirable in a patient with gastroenteritis, delay can be catastrophic in acute appendicitis, ischemic bowel, small bowel obstruction, volvulus, or incarcerated hernia.

If the diagnosis is not certain but the patient may have a potentially lethal condition that could be cured by an early operation, then an early operation should be performed—i.e., a small percentage of negative laparotomies are justified in patients with acute abdomen. This premise is best illustrated by the case of a patient with acute appendicitis. Here, a policy of watchful waiting may convert a simple appendicitis into a perforated appendicitis with generalized peritonitis and septic shock. The risk of death from this complication is many times higher than the risk from a small right lower quadrant incision in a patient who proves to have a normal appendix and mesenteric adenitis.

Analgesics, particularly narcotics, should be withheld from the patient until the diagnosis is established or until the decision to proceed to surgery has been made. Serial physical examinations will be totally useless if the patient has been given narcotics.

Antibiotics should also be withheld until a diagnosis has been made and the antibiotic therapy is needed. The only exception to this is the patient who presents in septic shock from an unknown cause. In that situation, broad-spectrum antibiotics should be part of the patient's resuscitation.

Fluid deficits and electrolyte imbalances should be corrected before surgery. The few exceptions are:

Conditions that threaten immediate exsanguination, such as a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

P.186

Conditions in which the fluid or electrolyte abnormality cannot be corrected in a reasonable amount of time—i.e., conditions that cause profound acidosis, such as necrotic bowel, where the acidosis cannot be corrected until the bowel is surgically removed

Nasogastric tubes should be placed before the induction of anesthesia to empty the stomach, thus minimizing the risk of pulmonary aspiration.

II Intestinal Obstruction

The normal flow of intestinal contents can be blocked by a mechanical obstruction or by a functional obstruction that occurs because of impaired intestinal motility. An acute abdomen often ensues.

A

Mechanical obstructions are common and have various benign and malignant causes. If not treated expeditiously (usually by surgical removal of the cause), mechanical obstructions can rapidly become lethal. Acute obstruction


occurs over hours to days and has a rapidly evolving course, whereas chronic obstruction may have a slow course with malnutrition, constipation, and other signs of chronic illness.

Types

Simple obstruction. There are no complicating factors, such as ischemia or perforation.

Strangulating obstruction. The blood supply to the involved segment of bowel is significantly impaired. The ischemia may result from a twisting of the intestinal blood supply upon itself (volvulus) or from a constriction of the blood flow by a tight band or hernial opening.

Closed loop obstruction. Both limbs of the bowel are obstructed; therefore, gas and liquid cannot pass in either direction.

Intussusception. The bowel invaginates itself, causing a narrowing of the lumen and subsequent obstruction. It may result from either viral infections or intraluminal polypoid tumors.

Perforating obstruction. The bowel proximal to the obstruction overdistends and perforates. The most common area of perforation when the colon is obstructed is the cecum.

Causes (Table 9-1)

Intestinal adhesions are the most common cause of obstruction.

They may result from a previous surgical exploration, particularly when talc was used to lubricate the surgeon's gloves, or their etiology may be obscure.

They may be diffuse, involving all peritoneal structures, or solitary, blocking only one area of the intestine.

Hernias (see Chapter 2 III and Chapter 29 II) are a second very common cause of intestinal obstruction. A segment of intestine migrates through a defect in the abdominal wall (external hernia) or through a mesenteric or omental defect (internal hernia) and becomes blocked by the narrow ring that is present at the peritoneal communication of the hernia.

TABLE 9-1 Causes of Bowel Obstruction

Type of ObstructionExamples

Mechanical Impaction

Lesions

 

 

 

Extrinsic

 

 

 

Adhesions

Previous surgery

 

 

Hernia

Incarcerated femoral hernia

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congenital

Meckel's diverticulum

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflammatory

Diverticulitis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Malignant

Sigmoid cancer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Masses

Ovarian cancer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Volvulus

Sigmoid or cecal

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radiation injury

Previous gynecologic malignancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.187

Intestinal tumors are the third most common cause of obstruction. The most common obstructing tumor is an adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. Benign lesions of the small bowel and colon, such as lipomas, can become the leading point of an intussusception. Other malignant tumors, such as carcinoid or lymphoma, can obstruct the intestinal lumen.

Other intrinsic lesions within the bowel wall or the lumen can cause acute obstruction.

Congenital lesions: webs, malrotations, and atresias

Inflammatory lesions: Crohn's disease, diverticulitis, ulcerative colitis, and infections such as tuberculosis

Luminal foreign bodies: bezoars, parasites, and gallstones

Radiation injury, other trauma , or endometriosis

Other extrinsic lesions , such as large intra -abdominal tumors or abscesses, can compress the intestinal lumen.

Treatment

Intestinal adhesions are treated by surgical lysis of the obstructing bands if the obstruction does not resolve in several days.

Hernias are treated by a reduction of the contents of the hernia and subsequent repair. The bowel must always be examined for necrosis.

Intestinal tumors are treated by surgical removal.

Treatment of intrinsic and extrinsic lesions depend on the lesion.

B

Functional obstructions are blockages in the intestinal flow that result from impaired motility (paralytic or adynamic ileus ). These are usually treated by observation and by fluid and nutritional support until the causal agent resolves. Possible causes include:


Direct irritation of the intestine , such as generalized peritonitis. Irritation may also be a factor in the postoperative adynamic ileus that can last for 3–7 days following surgery.

Extraperitoneal causes, such as retroperitoneal hematoma or nerve root compression. Retroperitoneal dissections, such as a nephrectomy or sympathectomy, can cause a prolonged ileus.

III Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

A

Causes of massive upper GI hemorrhage as shown by endoscopy are given in Table 9-2.

B Types of bleeding

The diagnosis of hemorrhage is generally obvious, but locating the site of bleeding may be difficult. The type of GI bleeding may give a clue to its source.

Hematemesis is the vomiting of blood that is either bright red or resembling coffee grounds in appearance. Hematemesis usually indicates a bleeding source proximal to the ligament of Treitz. Coffee -grounds hematemesis indicates that the blood has been in contact with gastric acid long enough to become converted from hemoglobin to methemoglobin.

Hematochezia is the passage of bright red blood by rectum. Although it indicates GI bleeding, it does not specify the level within the GI tract.

Melena is the passage of black, usually tarry, stools. Although melena signifies a longer time within the GI tract than bright red blood, it does not guarantee that the bleeding is from the upper tract.

TABLE 9-2 Causes of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Duodenal ulcer

Gastric ulcer

Diffuse erosive gastritis

Esophageal or gastric varices

Mallory-Weiss tear of the gastroesophageal junction

Gastric carcinoma

Arteriovenous malformations

P.188

Blood mixed with stool and mucus can produce a characteristic jellylike or “currant -jelly” stool. This may originate from a Meckel's diverticulum, particularly in children.

C History

The history should include information about previous episodes of GI bleeding, current medications (e.g., aspirin or warfarin use), and related diseases (e.g., hematologic disorders, alcoholism, peptic ulcer disease, and recent episodes of vomiting).

D

Physical examination should specifically include a search for evidence of nasopharyngeal bleeding, portal hypertension, weight loss, malignancy, or systemic diseases such as chronic hepatic or renal failure.

E Diagnosis

The cause and the location of the bleeding must be confirmed unless imminent exsanguination calls for immediate measures (see Chapter 21, I D 3 e [3] [f] ). In less urgent circumstances, once the patient has been stabilized, one

may continue with diagnostic procedures.

Fiberoptic endoscopy of the upper GI tract has become the optimal diagnostic procedure because it allows direct visualization of the lesion in over 80% of cases.

Endoscopy allows:

Determination of the size and number of lesions in most cases (lesions are multiple in 15% of cases)

Assessment of which site is actively bleeding

Assessment of the rate of bleeding. For example, if an arterial vessel is visibly bleeding in the base of a large duodenal ulcer, then there is a good chance that it will not stop bleeding.

Distinction between an ulcer, varices, gastritis, and a tear in the esophagus (Mallory-Weiss syndrome) that follows forceful vomiting

Determination of whether a lesion is benign or malignant

Endoscopy is only safe if the patient's vital signs are relatively stable. Sedation is dangerous because it increases the risk of vomiting followed by aspiration of the gastric contents into the pulmonary bed.

Upper GI series helps to define anatomy or pathology more completely, but unfortunately, it sheds little light on the relationship of a particular lesion to the hemorrhage.

Passage of a nasogastric tube aids considerably in determining that the source of bleeding is proximal to the ligament of Treitz.

Angiography and radionuclide scanning may occasionally help to locate the site of bleeding, but both procedures are more useful in lower GI hemorrhage.

F Treatment

If treated expeditiously in a systematic fashion, the patient with upper GI hemorrhage has an excellent chance for recovery. Treatment is aimed at supporting the patient's vital signs as well as stopping the hemorrhage. Resuscitation measures should begin immediately when the patient is first seen.

Medical treatment of aggravating factors can then begin.

A nasogastric tube is inserted, and the residual thrombus in the stomach is removed with an iced saline solution.

Clotting factors. Any clotting abnormalities are corrected with appropriate factors (see Chapter 1, III C 2).

Fresh frozen plasma if the prothrombin time is abnormal

Platelets if thrombocytopenia is present

Vitamin K if bleeding is from esophageal varices

Histamine 2 (H2 ) antagonists, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and antacids. An aggressive regimen is begun. H2 antagonists given as a continuous infusion are commonly used in this setting. Oral


antacids with gastric pH monitoring also have been used.

Vasopressin , a powerful vasoconstrictor, may be useful.

It can be infused through a peripheral vein at a rate of up to 1 U/minute, or it can be infused directly into the bleeding vessel by means of angiography.

Vasopressin temporarily controls bleeding in 75% of patients; by contrast, bleeding was stopped in 30% of patients treated conventionally without vasopressin. However,

P.189

vasopressin is contraindicated in patients with significant coronary artery disease because of coronary vasoconstriction.

Fiberoptic endoscopy , in addition to being a diagnostic procedure, may also be useful when esophageal varices are to be sclerosed (see Chapter 14, II E ) or small bleeding sites are to be coagulated.

Angiography similarly may be a therapeutic aid. It allows bleeding from small vessels to be controlled either by embolization of the bleeding vessel or by intra -arterial administration of vasopressin.

Balloon tamponade (see Chapter 14, II E 3 d) can be important in controlling bleeding from varices.

Surgical treatment. The type of surgery performed is discussed in Chapter 11 .

The patient's cardiovascular status, as well as the amount and duration of bleeding, is particularly important. For example, a patient with heart disease may tolerate continued bleeding poorly and thus may need early surgery.

Only about 10% of patients will require surgery.

Indications for surgery are as follows:

Exsanguinating hemorrhage. A patient with uncontrollable hemorrhage who is losing blood faster than it can be replaced must be sent to the operating room immediately for control of the site of bleeding.

Profuse bleeding , especially in association with hypotension. Patients should be treated surgically:

If more than 4 U of blood are required for initial resuscitation

If bleeding continues at a rate of more than 1 U every 8 hours

If a brief hypotensive episode could have catastrophic results, as in patients with coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular disease or in patients older than 60 years of age

Continued hemorrhage despite resuscitation and other treatment

The mortality rate of upper GI bleeding is low among patients who need less than 6–7 U of blood.

The rate increases dramatically with requirements above 7 U. Thus, surgery should be undertaken before the blood loss reaches that point.

Recurrent bleeding after its initial cessation. About one fourth of patients rebleed, and the mortality rate for these patients is as high as 30%, in contrast to a mortality rate of approximately 3% among patients who do not rebleed.

Pathologic features of the bleeding site that increase the risk of recurrent bleeding include:

A posterior duodenal ulcer with the gastroduodenal artery visible in its base

A giant gastric ulcer

Special situations may call for a modification of the usual routines of management.

A patient with a rare or hard -to -find blood type should be operated on while blood is still available.

A patient who refuses blood transfusion for any reason should undergo surgical exploration early.

A patient with a coagulopathy should have the disorder corrected, if possible, prior to surgical exploration.

G Prognosis

The prognosis for patients who are bleeding from a source other than esophageal varices is as follows:

Some 25%–50% will have a recurrence of bleeding during the next 5 years, and about 20% will require surgery.

The mortality rate is low (about 3%) if the bleeding stops spontaneously.

IV Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

A Overview

Acute lower GI hemorrhage is managed initially in much the same way as upper GI hemorrhage. P.190

Resuscitation with blood and intravenous fluids is begun immediately.

The history is taken, and a physical examination is performed.

Diagnostic studies are begun to identify the site and cause of the bleeding.

Vasopressin may be used as in upper GI bleeding (see III F 1 d).

B Initial studies

Anorectal examination is performed to determine if the source of bleeding is a hemorrhoid, anal fissure, anal carcinoma, or other anorectal lesion.

A bleeding site in the upper GI tract must be ruled out.

A nasogastric tube is passed to ascertain that no bleeding is present in the gastroduodenal region. On occasion, however, duodenal bleeding will not reflux into the stomach because of a closed pyloric sphincter. If bile is present, duodenal bleeding is unlikely.